Dalek

Chapter the 317th, a singular Dalek adventure.

Plot:

Answering a distress call, the Doctor and Rose arrive in an underground complex in Utah where tech billionaire Henry van Statten keeps his private collection of alien artefacts. He has one living exhibit, which he's never been able to get to speak, no matter how much his staff torture it. Finding out that the Doctor has alien knowledge, he lets the Time Lord enter the 'cage' in which the creature is kept in chains. The Doctor panics and asks to be let out when he sees that the creature is a Dalek. It's weaponry is non-functional, though; the Doctor attempts to kill it by electrocution, but Van Statten's security guards intervene. Rose has meanwhile been talking to Adam, an employee of Van Statten's from the UK. Adam hacks in to the cameras in the cage, and Rose sees the Dalek being tortured. She goes there and talks to the Dalek, and it plays on her sympathy. When she touches its dome, it suddenly comes back to life having absorbed her DNA, and breaks free from its chains. Adam and Rose run for it. The Dalek absorbs energy from the local grid, renewing its battered and aged armour. It then proceeds to kill every person it comes across. The Doctor closes bulkhead doors to trap the creature, but Rose is left on the wrong side when they close. The Dalek does not kill her; it is starting to change because of the influence of her DNA. The Doctor arms himself with a big space gun from Van Statten's collection and confronts the Dalek. The Dalek shoots a hole in the ceiling to let in the sun, and opens its casing to bask in the light. It then kills itself, not wanting to live as an 'impure' mutation. The Doctor and Rose leave, Rose having persuaded the Doctor to let Adam come with them.

Context:

I watched this one afternoon close to Christmas Day 2024, in a bit of a rush as I'd realised how close it was getting to the big day. I wanted to get a post written up and published before the 25th. I viewed it alone from a DVD copy, the individual disc release of episodes 4 - 6 of the new 2005 series that came out before that series had even completed on television. When I'd finished and took the disc out of the player, I noticed it was looking very scratched after all these years. Should I invest in the upscaled Blu-ray boxset of the new series stories originally broadcast in SD (the first four seasons plus specials)? Maybe in the new year I'll have a look for it in the January sales. Are there still January sales?

Milestone watch: I've been blogging new and classic Doctor Who stories in random order since 2015, and I'm now closing in on the point where I finish everything and catch up with the current stories being broadcast serially. This post marks the completion of another Doctor's televisual era, the ninth Doctor joining the fourth, seventh, eighth, eleventh and fourteenth in the 'Done' pile. It also marks the completion of another season of Doctor Who; I have in total completed 32 out of the total of 40 seasons to date (at the time of writing): classic seasons 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-18, 20, 21, 23-26, and new series 1, 2, 4, 5-7, 9-11, 13 and 14).

First Time Round:

In the UK, there was a public holiday for May Day on Monday May 2nd 2005; in the long weekend this created, I - along with the Better Half and friend Phil, mentioned many times before on the blog - travelled up from the south to Shropshire to visit long-term fan friend David (also mentioned many times before on this blog) and his Better Half. One of the things we did, as all of us were fans of the recently relaunched series, was sit down to watch a TV Dalek story (the first for 17 years). It had been very much hyped, but nonetheless exceeded expectations. It was enjoyed by everyone. Over that weekend, I remember we all went to a Birmingham cinema to watch the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie that had just come out. This was not enjoyed much by anyone. The other thing I remember was my being extensively and frustratingly poor at the board game Ticket To Ride, and not getting any better no matter how many times I was resoundingly defeated playing it. This was enjoyed by everyone (except me).

Reaction:

This viewing of Dalek came shortly after my watching the season 25 Blu-ray boxset (which came out in late October 2024). The first story on that set, Remembrance of the Daleks, has a scene towards the end where the Doctor confronts a lone Dalek and persuades it to kill itself. I know that essentially Dalek does a plot with those same basic beats over the course of 45 minutes, but the scene and the 2005 story could not be more different. Remembrance is one of the very best Dalek stories from the classic era, but it still includes a scene of a lone Dalek wobbling and fretting, rather than being a scary evil force. Many Doctor Who stories featured moments like this, or worse scenes where the Daleks were mocked; and, Remembrance aside, the inclusion of Davros in all their latter classic era stories tended to relegate them to fulfilling a role as henchmen rather than top-billed villains. Plus, there were many sketches and adverts sending them up (the last time the Daleks had a mass audience on TV before 2005 they were flogging chocolate biscuits). Dalek exists to empathically change the perception of the Daleks in the minds of the audience, annihilating any sense that they're pathetic, and reinvesting them with menace and import. Though it wasn't the most festive story written by Robert Shearman that I watched in December 2024 (see the Deeper Thoughts section to see what was), it was still somewhat apt. The story's raison d'etre is to roast some old chestnuts: each aspect that might seem silly about the Daleks - the sink plunger, the bumpy hemispheres on the skirt section, their seeming inability to go up stairs, etc. - is used to dark or murderous effect in the story.

A key way to do this that costs less but is more effective than effects work (though there's no slouching in that department, with great moments like the 'bullet time' scenes where the Dalek's forcefield stops a spray of rounds aimed at it, or where it effortlessly elevates itself floating up multiple flights of stairs) is to deploy the story's not so secret weapon, the intense and brilliant acting powers of its leading man. Christopher Eccleston is so good in this story that he burns through the TV screen. The Dalek prop is expertly given voice by Nick Briggs, in his first of many times behind the ring modulator doing vocal duty for Skaro's finest. But, it is how Eccleston reacts to Briggs that sears this story into one's imagination. Eccleston incendiary work is supported by sympathetic but still showy direction from Joe Ahearne. It's obvious why Ahearne was invited back to direct so many times in this season; every moment is framed expertly, from all the magnificent close-ups to set pieces like the Dalek dispatching dozens of security guards by setting off the sprinklers and letting the water conduct his electrifying shots. As I've said before on the blog, nobody can capture moving images of Daleks as well as Joe Ahearne. The script is also giving Eccleston a boost; the sprinkler scene and its aftermath alone delivering some of the best dialogue of the year, from the Doctor noting of the Dalek that "It wants us to see" the devastation it is wreaking, to the Doctor's tirade urging the Dalek to end its own life "Why don't you just die?!" followed up after a beat with the Pepper-pot's devastating "You would make a good Dalek".

As well as delivering a big dollop of the time war backstory that had been hinted at in the first few episodes of the series, the story also focusses on the Doctor's duality, the aforementioned war having left him more like a Dalek that he'd like to admit. This gives Billie Piper's Rose some good material too, calling him out regarding the unthinking hatred that the metal meanie has brought out. The moment where the Doctor thinks she's been exterminated hammers home the bond that exists between these two characters. Given that it's already obvious that the two of them together are something special, it isn't necessary to introduce Adam to highlight this by failing in the companion role (as I detailed in the 2020 blog post for following story The Long Game). That's not an issue in this tale, though, so the only real criticism I have is that the budget doesn't quite match up with the material; if the story had been the following year, it would have a full orchestra performing the wonderful score, rather than just Murray Gold's synths and samples, for instance. Mind you, if it had been the following year, it wouldn't have starred Eccleston, and I don't think Tennant - or indeed anyone - can do the Doctor's anger quite as well as Eccleston. The Dalek having bonded with Rose when it took a sample of her DNA to revivify itself, and hating the changes this brings on in it, its end is a quiet one rather than being in the heat of battle. There are excellent practical effects showing the mutant feeling the sunlight shine upon it before it dies. Exciting and clever, emotional and thoughtful, but with lots of action: watching Dalek in December made for a nice little early Christmas gift.

Connectivity:

Both Dalek and The Legend of Ruby Sunday see the Doctor accompanied by a single female companion visiting a base that has equipment beyond the capabilities of technology in the rest of the world at that time. In both stories, the Doctor is fearful at being confronted by a lone - and massively destructive - survivor of a race he'd previously encountered and thought was wiped out. 

Deeper Thoughts:

The Shear brilliance of the man: a quite timely but really not timely at all review of The Chimes of Midnight. Robert Shearman, the writer of Dalek, comes to many of the BFI Doctor Who screenings that I attend. He always hangs around after the screening in the bar and talks to other fans (he is a fan himself, as he's made clear in many interviews and writings). He was in the BFI Riverfront bar after the first of the two BFI events for The Happiness Patrol this year; there, my friend Scott embarrassed me slightly by informing Shearman that I wanted to tell him about how much I enjoyed something he'd written. The reason Scott particularly wanted me to be brave enough to tell him, and therefore forced my hand, was because the thing I enjoyed that he'd written had nothing to do with Doctor Who. It was a radio play called Forever Mine that Shearman wrote for broadcast in 2004 (on the BBC's radio 4), which starred Richard Briers and Pauline Collins. I only listened to it once, but its themes, plus some moments in the narrative and the mental images they provoked, have stayed with me since. A darkly comic play constructed around the difficulties that remarriage would present to widower and ex if the afterlife turned out to be real, it is haunting in its dramatisation of love and relationships, memory and identity. People at BFI events praising Shearman's Doctor Who work are probably ten a penny; I hope it was at least refreshingly different for him to meet someone extoling the virtues of an example of his other work. He certainly seemed a little surprised (maybe even bemused?) that it was Forever Mine in particular that had taken my fancy.

Shearman and friend

I couldn't, though, tell Shearman how good was his body of Doctor Who work, because - Dalek aside - I had never experienced any of it. Shearman came to prominence in Doctor Who circles because of his work for audio adventures company Big Finish. Long term readers of the blog will know that I've sampled only something like 0.001% of Big Finish's output, none of that smidge including any of Shearman's stories. Until very recently, that is. Wanting to listen to an example of his Big Finish work, I had seven audio plays to pick from, which he penned for the company between the years 2000 and 2007. All of them were well regarded at the time and to this day. One of the seven was Jubilee, the story that he adapted to create Dalek. To pick that one would, of course, have been most thematically aligned to this blog post, but instead I went for a story that was apt in a different way. The Chimes of Midnight, though it was first released in February (of 2002), is a Christmas ghost story. It may be Shearman's most popular work for Doctor Who audio. People are still talking about it: the 2024 Christmas edition of Doctor Who Magazine, issue 611, included an article on Big Finish's Christmas stories that didn't include Chimes because "people bang on about that one all the time". Perhaps the journalist imagined every Doctor Who fan had listened to it by now, but I had not. To rectify that I bought and downloaded Chimes, listening to it - rationed to one episode a day - in a week of late December 2024. The story sees Paul McGann's Doctor with his first audio companion Charley Pollard arrive at a house where some Sapphire and Steel style time anomalies are occurring.

The Original CD cover

The story deserves its reputation, it's got the whole package: intrigue, chilling scenes, and the same haunting quality that Forever Mine had: some of the moments where people within a somewhat artificial reality are altered as their memories are manipulated are very similar to the radio play, and similarly effective. It's also very Christmassy. The feel of the piece samples greatly from 1970s series Upstairs Downstairs, or half of it at least: the Doctor and Charlie can't ever get to the Upstairs and spend their time dealing only with the servants of the house, all of whom are beautifully written and performed (and a couple of which are in-jokingly named after the 1970s series' cast or crew). There's a repeated refrain that is used for both funny and increasingly eerie effect, "Christmas wouldn't be Christmas" without the cook Mrs. Baddeley's plum pudding, as many characters aver. Reportedly, Shearman indulged himself a little by making each cliffhanger moment a callback to previous 'rock star' classic series cliffs, part one ending like the first episode of The Space Museum, then the subsequent episode endings harking back to Kinda episode three and Horror of Fang Rock three. If that makes it sound like it would be clunky or artificial, I can tell you that the writing is sophisticated enough to perfectly assimilate any such material, no matter how geeky. Everything pays off, and a contained story with few characters and locations turns out to be even more bounded than it first appeared. It's good that the 0.001% of Big Finish audios I'd experienced before included the first 'season' of Eight and Charley audios (this story is from the second) as a little knowledge of her backstory is useful for the ending to have the weight that it should.

An online listening party for the story took place in 2020

Even though Shearman never wrote a story for Doctor Who on TV again, The Chimes of Midnight shows that his Who work for other media is just as imaginative and excellent. I may be wasting my effort with this quick capsule review, however: the chances are if you're reading this that you - unlike me - listened to the audio in question ages ago. If not, though, then I hope this seasonally apt but 20+ years late write-up has persuaded you to give it a listen. Merry Christmas! 

In Summary:

Christmas wouldn't be Christmas without an obligatory "Incidentally, a Happy Christmas to all of you at home!". (And, presumably, you don't need me to tell you that Dalek is great.)

The Legend of Ruby Sunday / Empire of Death

Chapter the 316th, where the Doctor takes a dog / god for a walk.

Plot:

[This is a relatively recent story of the streaming age, so be warned that there are spoilers ahead.] The Doctor and Ruby visit UNIT HQ in the present day. He wants their help in the cherchez of deux femmes - the mysterious woman whose faces keeps appearing everywhere he goes in the universe, and Ruby's birth mother. The former is easy as she's already on UNIT's radar: it's Susan Triad, the only nice tech CEO in the world. She's doing a big launch speech that very day, and Mel is undercover as one of her media team. The latter femme search requires a time window that UNIT have kept secret since the 1970s - and presumably rebuilt from scratch every time they've moved HQ. Feeding this room-size device with a CCTV tape of the night Ruby was left at the church on Ruby Road allows The Doctor and Ruby to be back there to see if they can ID her mother. But something else appears, a dark swirly force that seems to have the TARDIS police box within it. UNIT Archivist Harriet's surname turns out to be Arbinger: she's the Harbinger of the 'One Who Waits', the head of the pantheon: the swirly cloud resolves and it's Sutekh, who has survived in the space-time vortex by clinging on to the TARDIS (and become a larger and more doggy-faced god in the process). The Doctor and Mel are at Susan Triad's launch, and Triad also turns out to be under Sutekh's control. She releases dust that dissolves anyone with whom it comes into contact.

The Doctor and Mel escape on Mel's Vespa and race back to UNIT HQ as thousands of Londoners are dissolved by a growing cloud of dust. Most of UNIT's personnel are similarly dissolved; the Doctor and Mel rejoin Ruby in the time window chamber. Sutekh controls the TARDIS, but the version within the time window (from when it visited 2004 in The Church on Ruby Road) becomes solid from the power of their memories, and the trio escape in it. Across the universe the dust cloud rolls out; Sutekh has created a version of Susan Triad on every planet the TARDIS has ever visited, and each of them spreads the dust. The only reason the Doctor is still alive is because Sutekh is tortured by not knowing what significance Ruby's birth might have. Using a spoon he was given by a kind woman on an almost deserted planet - the memory TARDIS needing something real to fully function - the Doctor materialises the TARDIS in 2046, and uses the DNA database set up by villainous Prime Minister Roger ap Gwilliam to successfully trace Ruby's mother. Luring Sutekh with the possibility of that knowledge, the Doctor manages to hook intelligent rope round the dog god's collar, which he then attaches to the real TARDIS. The Doctor takes off, dragging Sutekh behind the ship. Pulling Sutekh like this through the vortex undoes the damage and restores the universe. Everyone comes back to life. Reluctantly, the Doctor cuts the rope and Sutekh floats free in the vortex and is killed. Ruby is reunited with her birth mother. The Doctor leaves her behind on Earth, but says he'll see her again.

Context:

I watched both episodes from the Blu-ray back to back on an evening early in December 2024. I was briefly tempted to try pausing Empire of Death at the probable point during the action that the Doctor explains to Ruby about his previous altercation with Sutekh, to watch the whole of the Pyramids of Mars Tales of the TARDIS (see First Time Round and Deeper Thoughts sections for more details) before resuming Empire of Death again. It was getting too late in the evening for me to stay up for another 76 minutes, though, and besides it was a pretty silly idea. Nonetheless, next time I watch this story, I'm sure I'll again consider doing it that way.

Milestone watch: I've been blogging new and classic Doctor Who stories in random order since 2015, and I'm now closing in on the point where I finish everything and catch up with the current stories being broadcast serially. This post marks the completion of another season of Doctor Who, meaning that I have in total completed 31 out of the total of 40 seasons to date (at the time of writing): classic seasons 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-18, 20, 21, 23-26, and new series 2, 4, 5-7, 9-11, 13 and 14); I've also completed five Doctors' televisual eras (fourth, seventh, eighth, eleventh and fourteenth).

First Time Round:

As with most of the series, I watched both The Legend of Ruby Sunday and Empire of Death just after midnight when they landed on the BBC iplayer, accompanied by middle child (boy of 15 years old, 14 at the time), on the 15th and 22nd June respectively. In the following days afterwards, I watched both again with the other two of my children (young man of 18, girl of 12). In between the episodes on the 20th June, I watched the aforementioned 'Tales of the TARDIS' version of Pyramids of Mars - which gave the uninitiated relevant backstory in an edited omnibus of the 1970s Tom Baker story where Sutekh first appeared - on its broadcast on BBC4. I could not interest any of the family in watching with me, but I enjoyed it very much. After I'd watched Empire of Death, I witnessed a strongly negative reaction from some fans I know, and many others online. I didn't understand this at all. It was like they had seen a different show to me; I will go into this more in the Reaction section below.

Reaction:

As usual when watching back episodes for the blog that I know have proved contentious on broadcast, I watched Empire of Death waiting for the moment when it all started to go south such that I would see the flaws many other people had seen... and, as is often the case in these circumstances, I waited and waited and the moment never came. I enjoyed it as much on this watch, if not more, than the previous times. Now that the dust has settled on the finale, and the season as a whole, it's clear that one of showrunner and writer Russell T Davies's aims was a slight Marvel-ification of Doctor Who, with the creation of its own set of Titans, albeit characters still weaved from Who's own past. Having given us a few of the pantheon (the Toymaker and Maestro, both of whom are namechecked in the Harbinger's speech at the climax of the first episode, as was another old monster the Mara, alongside a few others that we haven't - yet - met), the big bad "The One Who Waits" is revealed to be memorable 1970s villain Sutekh. Davies brings the character back from the dead: last seen in the vortex, Sutekh has endured clinging on to the TARDIS, invisible and intangible but feeding off time energy. It's an inventive way to bring back an interesting villain, adding the oomph a finale needs without resorting to the usual fallbacks of the Daleks, Cybermen or Master (who've perhaps become overused in recent years). The villain seducing the Doctor's TARDIS to the dark side is another great idea, leaving the Doctor without his greatest protection. Maybe a tiny flaw of Empire of Death is that it doesn't explore this as much as it could - the Doctor gets another TARDIS very quickly. What he gets (the memory TARDIS) is another magnificent and original concept, though: a just-about working space-time machine constructed from remembrances. Without impeding the action, it provides ultimate fan service, with long-term viewers straining to spot its every visual reference to stories gone by.

I read complaints online about how the seduced TARDIS subplot shouldn't have been done as it contradicted Matt Smith story The Doctor's Wife (where the TARDIS is personified as a woman who sees past and future, but who doesn't give the Doctor the nod that one day she'll be taken over by an fake Egyptian deity). Do people seriously think Davies should have abandoned his plotting because he can't go back in time to change a story from 2011? People may not have wanted the rematch, but that's what the writer has written; it seems silly not to engage with it on its own terms (particularly as 'being with godlike powers blocked the personified TARDIS from seeing these moments of its future' is a perfectly plausible filler for the continuity hole, and doesn't need spelling out). Another frequent complaint I saw online was how obvious it was, as soon as lots of regular characters got killed at the end of the first part, that there was going to be a reset at the end. People said this killed the tension, but I don't believe they felt that watching it; I just think they want other people online to know how clever they are. Sutekh is ultimately going to be defeated, that's a given - so should any spectacle, even if temporary, be toned down? The same people would complain that the stakes were too low, if so. Or should everyone have stayed dead? This is redolent of the imdb.com reviewer mentality: any episode of anything where a regular gets killed rates higher on imdb.com. It feels like a slightly adolescent urge for the show to be gritty, angsty drama again just like it was .. well, never, except maybe in the imaginations of adolescents watching first time round (oh, and in the Virgin New Adventures novels of the 1990s, I guess). To my mind, the quiet scenes in the memory TARDIS - Mel's battling against Sutekh's control, the Doctor's sadness at his adventuring having caused the calamity befalling the universe - speak more of the cost of this battle than leaving people dead.

Another gripe people had was that they felt conned. A great mystery had been set up through the year suggesting that there was something significant about Ruby's untraceable biological mother, only for it to be revealed that she is just an ordinary - magnificently ordinary - person. In a way, the drama was showing us ourselves: Sutekh's fatal flaw was that he thought like a fan, obsessing over details and imbuing them with more significance than they deserved. Viewers waiting for Ruby's Mum to be revealed to be the Rani, or whoever, missed the grounded and real and much more important story: a young Mum giving up her baby, and a girl growing up always wondering. That's where the real drama resides. Objections to this were similar to those raised against Star Wars sequel The Last Jedi (and those reactions were a direct influence on Davies when writing his finale, as he has mentioned in interviews). Star Wars franchise storytelling has always reflected ancient myths - or, if one is less charitable, terrible soap operas - where everyone turns out to be long-lost relatives of everyone else; Doctor Who, on the other hand, has always counterpointed the extraordinary with the ordinary. Ruby's birth parents being just a normal couple of teenagers (people are still holding out hope that her Dad is going to turn out to be the Master, or whoever, but I doubt it'll happen) is in keeping with Who's style. The phenomena witnessed around Ruby through the season (echoes of the day of her birth such as Carol of the Bells and snow falling) are all explained if one's paying attention. The combination of the TARDIS, Sutekh's power and the time window made it possible for memories to become matter. In The Devil's Chord, Maestro has the following dialogue tying it together: "Power like him... the oldest one... on the night of her birth, he can't have been there."

Maybe people didn't like the subtext that they were similar to the villain of the piece, that they'd missed the true emotion of the story to focus on side issues. There is definitely some fan baiting in the story: gloriously, in the first few minutes of The Legend of Ruby Sunday, the script blows out of the water the two main theories that fans, including me, had been painstakingly documenting through the season (Triad's forename is Susan like the Doctor's granddaughter, 'S Triad' is an anagram of TARDIS); that was all too obvious. Instead, the menace is hidden in a different way: SUE Triad TECHnologies = Sue Tech = Sutekh. This was a fun moment, except for pedants like me who feel physical pain at the Doctor's line "It was the wrong anagram". Arggh! It's not an anagram. Its not even a hidden word clue, it's two concealed homophones in a longer phrase. I accept that "It was the wrong wordplay" wouldn't be as strong a line; anyway, I didn't immediately go online to complain about it (I saved it until now). It's also true that Ruby's teenage mother's choice of winterwear (sinister hooded coat) is pushing the misdirection maybe a little too far, but I am oblivious concerning the teenage fashion choices of 2004, so what do I know? The scenes with Ruby's mother - Ruby seeing her in photos for the first time, Ruby ignoring the Doctor's caution to go and meet her, Ruby approaching her in the coffee shop, and the realisation when the barista calls out Ruby's name - more than make up for those minor quibbles, and Millie Gibson is terrific in all of them. There's also very effective links back to mid-season story 73 Yards, retrospectively explaining more of that earlier story and propelling the finale's narrative forward; the moment where Ruby knows exactly how many yards 66.7 metres equates to gave me goosebumps, and dangerous politician of 2046 Roger ap Gwilliam inadvertently contributes to Sutekh's downfall.

There's so many riches: Lenny Rush gives a fun performance; I particularly liked when he used the inbuilt machine guns in his Segway. Susan Twist, finally in a full proper role, is great. Anita Dobson is fantastic, funny and sinister in equal measures. The scenes of Mrs. Flood and Cherry Sunday are great: "He waits no more". Shivers. There's a great quiet scene in the first episode between the Doctor and Kate Lethbridge-Stewart where he talks about his family. The effects work in the time window scenes is exemplary. It's a brilliant cliffhanger between parts one and two (quibbles about anagrams notwithstanding). The Vespa chase sequence is exciting and well realised (both in terms of practical and visual effects work). The scene on the planet Agua Santina with Sian Clifford giving the Doctor a spoon was nice, and very reminiscent of the Flux episodes (I liked the Flux episodes). Nothing's perfect, of course: for example, it's nice to see Yasmin Finney back as Rose, but there is literally nothing for her to do. Perhaps Sutekh should have been powerful enough to work out Ruby's parentage sooner, but his fatal flaw would probably have meant he refused to believe the simple truth of it anyway. Besides, if he had, he'd have won and Doctor Who would have finished. Maybe that's what some fans want. The final scenes of the Doctor defeating Sutekh proved controversial, but I loved them. Sutekh as a dog on a lead - albeit an intelligent lead, a nice callback to the Christmas Goblins story - being pulled along by the TARDIS to undo his former damage to the universe is silly but fun. If one doesn't want silly but fun, but instead yearns for dark and gritty and angsty, Virgin New Adventures novels are available in second hand bookshops and on ebay.

Connectivity:

It's frustrating; More Than 30 Years in the TARDIS features clips of Pyramids of Mars, but none of them include Sutekh, so there's no link there. Unless I blinked and missed it, there's no clip featuring Bonnie Langford as Mel either. On the other hand, both the documentary and The Legend of Ruby Sunday / Empire of Death include new material featuring people who work for UNIT, returning companions and villains from the show's past, and a malevolent force invading the TARDIS.

Deeper Thoughts:

2024: A Divided Year. Now that it is December of 2024, it is probably time to look back at the events of the last twelve-month. A theme I've seen commented on already, and that I've also personally noticed, has been division. It was there in the politics; not just the extreme divisions of war as between Israel and Palestine or Ukraine and Russia, but in party politics pretty much everywhere. The UK had a general election where the two biggest parties looked more and more like polar opposites, and the second half of the year, when they had swapped places as parties of government and of opposition, did nothing to lessen that. The US in its presidential election was also split between Lawful Neutral and Chaotic Evil, and for some unfathomable reason chose the latter. Such division has been seen in miniature in Doctor Who fandom too, with Ncuti Gatwa's first season provoking extremes of reactions in either direction for different viewers. I get the feeling that this took some by surprise. The return of Russell T Davies to the showrunner role was seen as an unalloyed good when announced. His three David Tennant stories in 2023 offended nobody as far as I could see (and I scanned a lot of online reviews and discussions at the time). It was an anniversary, though, and the episodes saw the return of the most popular modern Doctor and one of the most popular modern companions; a certain amount of goodwill was to be expected. Come the actual season of goodwill and The Church on Ruby Road shown on Christmas Day 2023, and then throughout the eight episode run in 2024, things were different. The anniversary was over, Tennant was gone, and there seemed to be many more voices of disapproval. A reason this might have surprised is that Davies's first tenure (when running the show broadcast from 2005 to January 1st 2010) happened before mass market use of twitter.

The social media popular around that time were not as efficient at being the instant criticism engine that twitter subsequently became. Fans were still using online message-boards and discussion forums. I was one of said fans, and I can tell anyone who wasn't there, particularly the fans who were children then and have since grown up, that every episode of Russell T Davies' first tenure divided opinion, with as many declaring each episode the worst as the best. As such, I believe Ncuti's hit rate is going to be no better or worse than any other Doctor's. The online reaction will remain the same, though. Indeed, I think it always has, and only the medium has changed. If the 1970s Who producer Philip Hinchcliffe - whose era in charge was and is looked on by many as the high quality mark for Who stories - had returned to manage Doctor Who in the late 1980s, he would have got as much criticism in the fanzines as 1980s producer John Nathan-Turner did. I don't know why anyone would be masochistic enough to take on the Who showrunner role, as one's work only seems to be appreciated in retrospect; nevertheless, I'm glad that someone of Davies's calibre and experience decided to come back. He has given us an energetic new lead duo, and explored those characters effectively in a shortened run of stories. There's another season already in the can for 2025, and there will be a spin-off show The War Between the Land and the Sea shown in that year too. Even if there isn't a huge amount of merchandise in toy shops as there was in Davies's first period in charge (it would be rare for such a continuously long-running show to explode with that sort of public popularity twice) I think the series is in good health. A couple of stories (73 Yards, Dot and Bubble) were very strong indeed, and even those that didn't work as well (Space Babies) were doing different and interesting things.

On the home video front, 2024 brought the usual two Blu-ray box sets of classic seasons. I'd hoped for three instead of two, and got my wish in a way. The same team of restorers and special feature content makers did work on a third season for Blu-ray as well as Tom Baker's season 15 and Sylvester McCoy's season 25. It just wasn't Doctor Who, but instead was the first season of Who's 1970s rival / sister show Blakes' 7. More division: I have heard that this has enraged some fans who want the Who release rate to be faster, and would rather all the people involved concentrated on Time Lords only, without involving themselves with that ragtag bunch of freedom fighters fighting the oppressive Federation. I'm fine with the team diversifying, and will most likely pick up a copy of the Blakes' 7 set at some point. The new Tales of the TARDIS prompted by Sutekh's return on TV was an edited omnibus version of the last of the Osirans' first appearance in the series, Pyramids of Mars, topped and tailed by new footage of the Doctor and Ruby in the memory TARDIS. This was released as part of Ncuti's first season boxset. The only animation of a missing 1960s story was The Celestial Toymaker in June. It worked very well, the new style enhancing the original story. I hope the team that worked on it, and the other regular team (whose last known project was The Underwater Menace animation that came out late in 2023) are both working away on new titles for release in 2025. The other classic series release in 2024 was The Daleks in Colour, the first in a new line of re-edited and colourised 1960s stories. After a TV showing for the 60th anniversary in 2023, the Dalek story was brought out on disc early in 2024. The War Games has been given similar treatment for a TV outing over Christmas 2024, and will no doubt be available to own shortly afterwards.

The blog has covered 28 stories so far this year. As well as all seven of Ncuti Gatwa's 2024 stories, there has been at least one story blogged for each of the Doctors except Christopher Eccleston (but the year's not over yet). Colin Baker's entry was a webcast not a fully canonical TV story, and Paul McGann's was an even shorter webcast. They count, though, or at least I've decided that they do. Aside from Gatwa, the only actor to rack up more than two stories on the blog in 2024 is David Tennant with three, one from his first tenure, two from his second. I've also covered a few 'off-piste' adventures: a webcast featuring an alt-Doctor, an extended TV skit featuring an alt-Doctor, and a documentary with some new in-universe dramatic scenes. I went back to Gallifrey again for a holiday (see The Ice Warriors post for more details), and was lucky enough to get a ticket to every BFI Doctor Who event this year (and one Blakes' 7 event too, but I won't say any more about that for fear of upsetting any purists!). The write-ups of these events (except the Blakes' 7 one, natch) can be found in the Deeper Thoughts sections of the following vaguely connected or wholly unconnected posts (this is the problem with having blogged most of Doctor Who now, there's only so many places to provide a home for sharing these events): the screening of the Darkness & Light documentary and Horror of Fang Rock from the Season 15 Blu-ray box set was coupled with the Full Circle blog post; the showcase of newly animated The Celestial Toymaker went with The Sensorites; the first attempt to screen an updated The Happiness Patrol from the season 25 Blu-ray box set was paired with Survival; the second, successful attempt to screen an updated The Happiness Patrol is covered alongside The Hungry Earth / Cold Blood. I hope to attend more such events in 2025, but whether I'll be able to share them here depends on their scheduling, and how quickly I finish the very few stories I have left to blog.

In Summary:

I love it. So there.

More than 30 Years in the TARDIS

Chapter the 315th, which celebrates more than 30 years of More than 30 Years in the TARDIS.

Plot:

A young boy playing on the streets of London sees shop window dummies come to life, a web-strewn newspaper seller, and a post box that turns into a Dalek. Or maybe it's just in his imagination as he watches Doctor Who from behind the sofa. The Doctor (or Jon Pertwee) rides in the Whomobile again and is surrounded by dinosaurs that then disappear back in time. Susan (or Carole Ann Ford) is chased by Daleks in Westminster; she leaves some behind by climbing up some steps, but a Dalek hover scout pursues, so she escapes in the TARDIS. Cybermen patrol around St. Paul's Cathedral, following the Doctor and Peri (or Colin Baker and Nicola Bryant). Our heroes give the metal meanies the slip, but then a Cybermat attacks them. The Doctor and Ace (or Sylvester McCoy and Sophie Aldred) are chased by Haemovores who turn out just to be actors in costumes. Sarah Jane (or Lis Sladen) is observed by a Sontaran entering a house. She watches TV alongside the young boy. Robomen and Daleks as they looked in the 1960s movies are observed by the movie Susan (or Roberta Tovey). The Brigadier (or Nicholas Courtney) visits the National Army Museum, but is attacked by Autons. He escapes in his chauffeured car, but the driver is also an Auton. The boy walks into the TARDIS and sees Susan, but then a Dalek appears in the control room. The boy, now back on the sofa with Sarah Jane, is grabbed by her when she is taken over by the Sontaran, with her eyes glowing green. Jamie and Victoria (or Frazer Hines and Deborah Watling) find themselves on Skaro surrounded by the Emperor Dalek and dozens of his underlings. In between all this, people are interviewed about the history and making of Doctor Who's first thirty years, and lots of clips are shown from Who and other shows.

Context:

This seemed like an apt one to watch for Doctor Who's anniversary on Saturday 23rd November 2024, which was not that far from the 30th anniversary of this cut of the documentary's release on VHS. But how would it stand up to a grilling from the standard canon questions I ask about my occasional off-piste viewings? Does it star the Doctor? Yes, I think there are moments where Jon Pertwee is appearing as the Doctor rather than himself, and there are sequences with Autons and Daleks, etc. Does it have visuals? Absolutely. Was it released as an official Doctor Who or official spin-off story (i.e. its not an unofficial fan-made proposition)? Yes. Is there a dramatic context to the story (i.e. it's not just a skit)? Hmm... the dramatic sequences aren't played for laughs, so I wouldn't say it's a skit, but obviously the main point is documentary rather than drama - I'm giving it a free pass. Was it released with the intention of being the main attraction for audience engagement (i.e. it's not just an extra on a DVD or Blu-ray)? Yes. Have I already covered it in passing with another connected story? No. The assessment being successfully done, I watched from the DVD, on my own - it was a bit too niche a prospect to try to interest the family in - musing a little as I did why it has not been made available on the BBC iplayer. It is probably prohibitive rights issues for all the many non-Who clips featured.

Milestone watch: I've been blogging new and classic Doctor Who stories in random order since 2015, and I'm now closing in on the point where I finish everything and catch up with the current stories being broadcast serially. Aside from the occasional sideways step into spin-offs or oddities like More than 30 Years in the TARDIS, I have completed five Doctors' eras and 30 out of the total of 40 seasons to date (at the time of writing): classic seasons 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-18, 20, 21, 23-26, and new series 2, 4, 5-7, 9-11, and 13).

First Time Round:

I watched the original version of the documentary live as it went out on BBC1 in the UK on Monday the 29th November 1993. The celebrations for Doctor Who's 30th anniversary were many that year. The documentary was shown halfway through a weekly repeat of Planet of the Daleks: interrupted the previous Friday by Children in Need, it would resume four days after the documentary was shown. The Children in Need telethon featured the first part of Doctor Who skit Dimensions in Time, with the second part shown the following evening on Noel's House Party, a shiny-floored primetime entertainment show of the time. I was in my third year student house in Durham for all of these; we had a Radio Rentals big screen TV (my housemates and I all chipped in at the start of the year for the hire costs) connected to someone's toploader VCR brought from home on which I recorded the documentary onto a VHS tape. I don't still have the tape; this is a shame, as - unless I'm missing it - I can't find the original version as transmitted that Monday anywhere on any online video sharing sites. I am much more familiar with the extended version that is the subject of this blog post - it was released on VHS almost a year later, and that's when the 'More than' was prepended to the title. I bought and watched it, at home in Worthing by that time as I'd graduated, on or soon after its release date on 7th November 1994. I can't remember all of the differences between the two. I don't think the TV version had the section interviewing Roberta Tovey on her own about the 1960s Doctor Who films, nor the sequence where Frazer Hines and Deborah Watling stumbled across the Emperor Dalek. The TV version had a scientist explaining how time travel might be possible which was excised for the VHS. I'm sure there were many other differences too, as it was over a half hour longer than on TV.

Reaction:

When Doctor Who videos started coming out regularly in the early 1990s, they weren't the only tapes the BBC were releasing. For a good few years it was boom time, with lots of different television science fiction and fantasy titles coming out. The 1981 TV adaptation of The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy was one of those titles, released on two tapes in 1992. Before the episodes on them played, each tape had a brief message asking the purchaser to register their interest (maybe by writing to a PO box, or possibly phoning a number, I don't have the tapes any longer to check) in the purchase of a potential behind the scenes making-of documentary that might be made available. Enough people must have responded, and that indirectly led to the creation of this Doctor Who documentary. Kevin Jon Davies directed The Making of the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy and it was released on its own VHS early in 1993. Having done this, Davies was perfectly placed to make a similar documentary for Doctor Who later in the year. The Hitch Hiker doco used a framing device which featured Simon Jones playing both himself and Arthur Dent in newly staged scenes within the fictional universe of the show; More than 30 Years in the TARDIS did the same with multiple cast members. Interview material from the same session with Douglas Adams appears in both pieces (Adams was a script editor on Who, as well as creator of Hitch Hiker, of course). I have looked around online and can't find any absolute confirmation whether the original 30 Years documentary was initially commissioned for BBC TV, or for BBC Video as his previous effort was. Whether it was as an extension of the original remit, or the culmination of the original aim, or indeed a bit of both, a re-cut documentary expanded with additional material not shown on TV was released on VHS towards the end of 1994.

There's a lot more of Doctor Who than The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, so Davies has more of a challenge to give every area of Who sufficient coverage in a coherent fashion. He finds a good structure to achieve this. The documentary is in three sections: the Doctor and the Daleks, Monsters and Companions, and Laughter and Tears Behind the Scenes. Sections end with a cliffhanger resolved in the next section, and in between sections are Who-related adverts for Walls Sky Ray ice lollies and Prime Computers. The interviewees are a pretty comprehensive selection; there's nobody from behind the scenes of Patrick Troughton's time, but there were few of those people still living in 1993. Peter Davison is conspicuous by his absence; probably he was too busy rather than wanting to distance himself from the role. Tom Baker is only represented by archive material. All the expected topics are covered: the genesis of the show, Daleks and other monsters, the companions and sexism, special and visual effects, the right level of frightening for kids, the use of humour, the show's eventual cancellation and its afterlife in novels, comics and videos. Davies also manages to explore some of the less well-known nooks and crannies of Who history. The 1960s Dalek movies are given generous coverage (Davies would create another VHS documentary dedicated to these two movies soon after More Than 30 Years). In the fake credits bits in between the sections, he sneaks in test footage for the series' different title sequences. There's un-transmitted sequences from stories included, a couple of Doctor Who novelty songs accompanying clip montages, and lots of Doctor Who being covered on other shows (Blue Peter, Crackerjack, Nationwide, Pebble Mill, and more).

There are loads of clips from Doctor Who, of course, but I think many fans including myself were getting a bit blasé about such glimpses of old Who by then. The aforementioned boom time of VHS had convinced us that all of Doctor Who would be available to own before too long, but - as will be discussed in the Deeper Thoughts section below - behind the scenes documentaries were more rare. Therefore, curios like the adverts and the excerpts of studio footage were more enticing. The newly staged scenes and recreations (Daleks on Westminster Bridge, Draconians and Ogrons on the South Bank, Cybermen at St Paul's) were as close to new Doctor Who as fans were going to get at the time, and so were received with enthusiasm. It was also gratifying, though this might seem strange to someone who wasn't around at the time, that commentators were on screen being interviewed as self-proclaimed Doctor Who fans. Such was fandom's perceived lack of wider affection for their favourite show, that getting Mike Gatting, Toyah Wilcox, Lowri Turner and Ken Livingstone involved seemed like a boon. I have never thought of Cybermen or Jon Pertwee in the same way since hearing Wilcox and Turner rhapsody about how sexy both were. Some of my favourite moments from the documentary: seeing William Hartnell's family photographs courtesy of his granddaughter Jessica Carney; a great live telly moment where a Doctor Who competition on Good Morning with Anne and Nick goes a bit wrong; discussions on a new younger generation of fans featuring Gerry Anderson with his son Jamie, and Lis Sladen with her daughter Sadie Miller. The parents are sadly no longer with us, but both the youngsters now grown up have ongoing roles in the world of Doctor Who audio.

There are loads more goodies. The effects sequence where a character opens the police box doors and enters the TARDIS control room in one shot is marvellous, and was the first time this had ever been done. Mary Whitehouse, an activist who lobbied for her own self-defined standards to be applied to television, is - in my opinion, of course - patronising and wrong about violence in Doctor Who in her interview, but Davies mischievously cuts from her to John Nathan-Turner saying he was happy whenever Whitehouse complained about the show as it added 2 million to the viewing figures. Douglas Adams comes over as the cleverest person involved in the documentary when talking about how humour and drama should best work together. This is unsurprising for two reasons; first, Davies was a long-time collaborator with Adams and so he was bound to show him in a good light; second and more importantly, Douglas Adams was the cleverest person involved in the documentary. There's a wonderful moment towards the end where Alan Yentob, who at the time was Controller of BBC1, is asked about ongoing discussions about Doctor Who's future (that would lead to the Paul McGann TV movie three years later) and quotes Michael Dobbs' Francis Urquhart "You might think that, but I couldn't possibly comment". This came at the very end of the documentary in its initial form as broadcast on TV, and my only criticism of More Than 30 Years in the TARDIS is that in the recut it is followed by two scenes; I would have kept the initial ending and moved those other bits up. All in all, though, watching this documentary was a great way to celebrate Doctor Who's 61st anniversary.

Connectivity:

If I counted up correctly, there are three clips of The Seeds of Doom in the documentary; so, both the Tom Baker story and More Than 30 Years in the TARDIS clips feature the Krynoid.

Deeper Thoughts:

The Doctor's Documentaries. I have collected all the DVD releases of Doctor Who stories and all the Blu-ray releases so far. Each disc of this collection is replete with myriad extras including many a documentary, and I've diligently watched them all. As such, it's hard now for me to cast my mind back and realise that for many years of my fandom a Doctor Who documentary was a rare and precious thing. And before that it was an impossibility. For the whole of the 1980s up to the end of the original run (I started watching in 1981 and continued all the way through the classic series in that decade), I never saw a single one as there wasn't really one to see. There had been only one significant documentary made for the UK by that point. This was Whose Doctor Who, a Melvyn Bragg presented 60-minute long episode of the BBC's Lively Arts strand from 1977 (a few sequences from it were reused in More than 30 Years in the TARDIS). I hadn't been a Doctor Who fan in 1977; even if I had, as I was but four years of age I probably would not have been interested in something about Doctor Who that wasn't Doctor Who itself. Shows like that didn't get archive repeat showings on TV, and in the 1980s the Doctor Who VHS range was only just releasing Doctor Who episodes, with no indication that it would ever release documentaries too. The first time I got to see Whose Doctor Who was when it was released as an extra on The Talons of Weng-Chiang DVD in 2003. I didn't feel I was missing out too much, because there was a Doctor Who magazine every month covering the making of the show in some detail, and occasionally there was a brief feature on a kid's TV show (Mat Irvine talking about effects on Saturday morning TV, or a behind the scenes view on a BBC programme like Take Two, as a couple of examples). There was definitely a gap in the market, though, for something more long form.

Whose Doctor Who Title Card

So, who had the nous to spot that gap, and make the first Doctor Who documentary I ever saw? It pains me a little to say it, because the blog has been a bit critical at times of his work creating them, but it was John Nathan-Turner and it was the Years tapes. Nathan-Turner was producer of Doctor Who throughout the 1980s, and after that had become a consultant for BBC Who product ranges. By 1991, VHS tapes ere being released more regularly than in the 1980s, and there was room to do something different. As a way to package up orphaned 1960s episodes where the rest of the story was not present in the archives, Nathan-Turner successfully pitched the idea of Years tapes: documentaries framing the included episodes and clips. In June of that year, the first two (The Hartnell Years and The Troughton Years) were released. This was ahead of its time thinking from the former producer; while working on the range, as well as creating new documentaries, he made expanded versions of stories incorporating material cut for time, and audio versions of missing stories with narration. In The Tom Baker Years, needing a new idea as Baker's era existed in full with no orphaned episodes, Nathan-Turner created the in-vision commentary, many years before DVD existed, with Tom Baker talking through and reacting to various clips from his stories. All these ideas would become standard much later, after his pioneering but embryonic attempts. A key problem was that there was minimal budget to realise any of these, and that tended to show. I wasn't as wowed as I should have been on watching my first ever long form Who documentary, because it just involved one actor (Sylvester McCoy in the case of The Hartnell Years) speaking brief links to camera. I also would have preferred to watch a full story (and there were loads still to be released) rather than odd episodes, so the main draw between the links wasn't engaging me either.

McCoy doing a link for The Hartnell Years

In January 1992, I saw my first documentary not created by John Nathan-Turner, Resistance is Useless, a 30 minute clip show with a framing device even cheaper than Nathan-Turner's (just an actor's voiceover accompanying a static prop giving us what was captioned as the 'Thoughts of an Anorak'). It was shown to herald the start of a BBC2 season of archive repeats that started immediately afterwards. Though it was great to see the clips, and interesting to learn some facts about the show, this still wasn't a full, proper documentary. That came the following year, also courtesy of the VHS range. As an extra on the tape of Silver Nemesis, a documentary The Making of Doctor Who made by a New Jersey public broadcast network on the making of the story was included. This was the full package, including interviews with cast and crew and behind the scenes footage of rehearsal and production of the 25th anniversary story. One could argue that the BBC shouldn't have needed programme makers from the US to show it how to make a Making Of, but I was very excited by this addition no matter who made it (more than I was by Silver Nemesis, if I'm honest). The documentary remained unreleased on shiny disc for many years, but finally was included on the season 25 Blu-ray box set released in October 2024 (I've got the set, and the US doco is every bit as comprehensive and fun as I remembered). Later in 1993, 30 Years in the TARDIS became the definitive retrospective documentary (particularly in the extended VHS version). The 1996 TV movie had Electronic Press Kit (EPK) material shot during its making, as was becoming more and more common.

The Silver Nemesis VHS came with The Making of Doctor Who

A few years on and DVD arrived, its additional capacity allowing for - and making consumers demand - more content accompanying the main feature. There was an explosion of Doctor Who documentaries as a result. By the time new Doctor Who launched on screens - and shiny discs - in 2005, it would have seemed more odd for its production to go unrecorded than not, and duly a sister show Doctor Who Confidential (later called Doctor Who Unleashed, but essentially the same show) was created. It would have an episode for each story, covering the behind the scenes process of its making. Some of this material would also make it on to the home video box set releases. In 2022, an authored documentary was created called Doctor Who Am I, showcasing Matthew Jacobs - writer of the aforementioned 1996 TV movie - and his engagement with mass fandom. This achieved the rare feat of a brief theatrical run in UK cinemas. Documentaries about the Doctor have come a long way since those early forays, and any child starting to watch Doctor Who now will likely have a much better first documentary experience than I did. Nonetheless, a debt is owed to those that pioneered such work, including JNT.

In Summary:

Docu-tastic!

The Seeds of Doom

Chapter the 314th, where confidence is a preference for the habitual collector of what is known as ... plant life!

Plot:

A three-man scientific team in Antarctica discover a large, green plant pod in the ice. They send word to the World Ecology Bureau, who bring in UNIT as the pod's presence is unexplainable. The Doctor and Sarah travel to the scientists' base. Not heeding the Doctor's warning not to touch the pod, the scientists examine it, and one of them is attacked by a shoot that whips out of it. He starts to go green and transform into a plant. Meanwhile, a civil servant from the Bureau, Dunbar, makes some money selling information about the pod to a millionaire plant enthusiast Harrison Chase. Harrison sends his Head of Security, a mercenary called Scorby, and nervy pet scientist Keeler off to Antarctica to fetch the pod. The Doctor knows all about the pod, and knows that there will be a second one buried in the snow, duly uncovering it. It is a Krynoid, a carnivorous alien plant creature that will kill everyone on Earth if it isn't stopped. The scientist transforming into a Krynoid goes on the rampage. Scorby and Keeler steal the other pod, escaping after setting a bomb on a timer. It blows up the base, destroying the Krynoid. Luckily, the Doctor and Sarah survive. They are picked up by a rescue team and return to the UK. They trace the second pod to Harrison Chase's estate and sneak in to the house. Sarah is captured, and Chase intends her to be the second victim of the Krynoid. The Doctor rescues her, and Keeler is instead the one attacked.

Keeler begins to transform, and the insane Chase - desperate to see what sort of plant he will grow into - imprisons him in a cottage in the grounds and has him fed raw meat. Dunbar, trying to make amends, enters Chase's estate to confront him. He is killed by the escaped Krynoid, which has now grown bigger than a human. The Doctor, Sarah and Scorby are trapped in the cottage with the Krynoid outside, now grown almost as big as the cottage. The Doctor devises a plan, and escapes to return with reinforcements. Scorby and Sarah hide in the main house. The Krynoid can now control nearby plant life; vines and ivy smash through the windows of the house. Chase has somehow developed a mental link with the Krynoid and wants it to succeed. The Doctor returns with UNIT troops who use weedkiller sprays to keep the plants at bay. Scorby makes a break for it, but plants drag him to his death in a pond in the grounds. Chase tries to kill the Doctor by putting him in his industrial-size compost maker, but ends up falling in and getting minced himself. UNIT contact the RAF who blow up the Krynoid (now the size of Chase's manor). The Doctor takes Sarah on a holiday in the TARDIS, but they end up back in Antarctica again.

Context:

Watched from the DVD with the individual episodes spread out a little bit (I watched one every other day, approx.) during late October and early November 2024. People from the household would drift in and out during my viewings, but nobody sat down and watched the story with me. The Better Half was in the room, if not actually fully watching, for a couple of the episodes. She commented at one point that Tony Beckley's velvety villainous performance as Harrison Chase - one of my all-time favourite turns in classic Who - was, quote "A bit like Dick Dastardly". I thought this was a mightily unfair assessment, but after that there were a couple of scenes where Chase rants about how he's "surrounded by idiots", so maybe there's a little truth in it. As it turned out, I made a good choice to watch from the DVD. Had I viewed the story on the BBC iplayer, the story would have disappeared halfway through my watch. Both The Seeds of Doom and Terror of the Zygons were taken down from the streaming platform on the 1st November 2024, a year after being made available as part of the wider 'Whoniverse' section. There are two things unique about those two stories in the Doctor Who canon - they're the only ones written by Robert Banks Stewart, and the only two scored by Geoffrey Burgon. Presumably an agreement with the estates of one of those gentlemen (most likely Stewart) ran out after a year.

Milestone watch: I've been blogging new and classic Doctor Who stories in random order since 2015, and I'm now closing in on the point where I finish everything and catch up with the current stories being broadcast serially. This marks the completion of another Doctor's televisual era, and not just any Doctor. Completing every one of the stories starring Tom Baker, the longest-running Doctor ever having been in the role for seven years, was a big milestone. I'll go into more detail to mark this in the Deeper Thoughts section below. Tom is the fifth Doctor completed so far (the seventh, eighth, eleventh and fourteenth Doctors having been completed before Baker). This post also marks the completion of another season, the 30th out of the total of 40 seasons to date (at the time of writing): classic seasons 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-18, 20, 21, 23-26, and new series 2, 4, 5-7, 9-11, and 13).

First Time Round:

The obsessive detailing of every aspect of Doctor Who on the internet helps me to precisely date when I first watched particular stories. It works only if the first time I watched a story is when it was broadcast or repeated or released on a home video medium (the dates of which are freely available online for every story); there are a few, though, that are more difficult to pin down exactly because I first encountered them on a pirated video tape, the sort that was lent out or exchanged between fans in the 1980s and 90s. The Seeds of Doom was one of these: I know that my first glimpse of the story was on the Tom Baker Years clip compendium released on VHS in September 1992 (I was a bit bemused as to what was going on when watching a clip of various characters carrying pot plants from one place to another). So it was sometime after that but before the sell-through VHS release in August 1994. In that period, the only person who would have provided me stories that hadn't been officially released yet was fan friend David (mentioned many times before on this blog). I'd met David at university, but he was a few years ahead of me, and in 1992 had graduated. He did come to visit sometimes, though, so my guess is on one of those visits he brought a tape with him for us to watch. It was most likely early 1993 (I remember that Doctor Who was being repeated on BBC2 when he came back up to Durham in my second year). The reason why I'm particularly interested is that, given all the evidence above, I first watched The Seeds of Doom in my early 20s, but the one thing I can remember very clearly about that first watch is that the story creeped me out. I thought I was beyond being scared of  Doctor Who by that age, but The Seeds of Doom still had the power to horrify.

Reaction:

Just as I started to write up my reaction to The Seeds of Doom, the final story I had to blog of the early and popular Tom Baker era produced by Philip Hinchcliffe and script-edited by Robert Holmes, the latest Doctor Who Magazine (issue 610) was sent out to subscribers and dropped through my letter box. It was momentarily disconcerting to flick through the magazine and find this era and in particular Hinchcliffe himself was being covered in unprecedented detail, taking up about a third of the magazine. I thought for a terrible moment that he'd died, but happily this was not the case. It seems that his reaching his 80th birthday was the prompt for an in-depth and lengthy interview on his years working on the programme. Because he is so ubiquitously lauded by fandom, I probably react against that and tend to underestimate Hinchcliffe's input into the stories of his that I've covered here over the years. Undoubtedly he made a huge contribution to The Seeds of Doom. The most obvious sign of this is that the story's roots are showing; as with many a story that he and Holmes elicited from writers for Who, there is an obvious monster movie inspiration, or inspirations plural in this case: the first two-episode section set in Antarctica steals like a genius from the 1951 film The Thing From Another World. The second four-part section is a mash-up of Quatermass and The Day of the Triffids. That innovative way of structuring a six-part story in two sections is also something Hinchcliffe and Holmes brought in, and writer Robert Banks Stewart makes the most of it. As the audience has seen the impact on a human attacked by the pod once, there's enhanced dramatic energy in the third episode as the anticipation builds about who will be the second victim, and then the next three episodes show the process happening again, quickly progressing beyond what had been seen before.

Although all of that input from producer, script editor and writer is significant, it's the contributions from director Douglas Camfield and composer Geoffrey Burgon that are most important - they provide the eerie atmosphere I felt on my first watch that is this story's defining factor. The same people worked on the beginning story of the season as well as this season finale. They achieved a similar atmosphere in that story at first, but as I'll mention in the Deeper Thoughts section below the drama and excitement couldn't be sustained in the Zygons story. In this their second attempt of the year, they almost manage to sustain it for the full six episode length. Only once the interesting villain and henchman are dispatched do things start to fall apart. The solution to the Krynoid monster, that has grown to the the size of a mansion, is simply to blow it up. This is disappointingly prosaic, particularly as the Doctor has been quoted earlier in the serial saying that "Bullets and bombs aren't the answer to everything". Then, there's a supposedly humorous coda where the Doctor and Sarah end up back in Antarctica because the Doctor has failed to reset the TARDIS coordinates. Not only is this a continuity error (they didn't travel there in the first place by TARDIS but were helicoptered in) but it is also obscure. They join in reciting "Have we been here before ... or are we yet to come?" portentously, and then burst into laughter. But it's not a joke and it's not a quotation, so what does it mean? It's a bizarre way to end both story and season. It's a shame that the only major negative aspects of the story are saved for the very end, as everything else is pretty wonderful.

There are some good action set pieces: another thing that Camfield regularly brings to stories is well-shot scenes where soldiers blow things up, and he doesn't disappoint here. The soldiers in question are a kind of zombie UNIT. Technically this counts as the final UNIT story of their initial era, but none of the regulars of Jon Pertwee's time are featured, all having bowed out in stories earlier in the run; as such, this lot may as well be any old squaddies. There's a couple of moments where the Doctor behaves quite violently for the time - a neck twist he gives Scorby is particularly nasty - but these are brief. A rightfully praised bravura moment sees the Doctor smash down into a room through a skylight, knock out a baddie, grab a gun, save Sarah and deliver a quip (when asked drily by Chase what he does for an encore, he replies "I win") then exit the room, all in about 30 seconds. The production design is great (the skylight that Baker breaks and the room he drops into look real. The effects are all of high quality; Some scenes creating Antarctica are more impressionistic than realistic, but they work. The model work is intricate and excellent throughout. The stages of Krynoid transformation are mostly good, with only the wobbly version that attacks Dunbar at the end of episode four looking a bit too Monthy Python to be scary. Small lapses like that don't matter too much, though, as all the actors are playing the material with utmost conviction, and the material is rich. Baker is at his most brooding; the line "You must help yourselves", when suggesting that one scientist amputate the other's arm to stop the infection, is a moment that shows the Doctor at his most alien. Lis Sladen gets to challenge the baddies in some emotive scenes too.

The three scientists in the first two episodes are good, particularly as two of them have to deliver their performances from behind awfully fake beards, but it's the main guest characters that feature throughout or in the last four episodes that make this story special. Tony Beckley is fantastic at the velvety villainy, and does a plausible take on a rapid descent into madness. His childlike delivery of the line "I could have had two pods" is telling and chilling in equal measure. To my mind, though, he is marginally bested by his henchman. John Challis's turn as Scorby is one of the all-time best performances in the classic era of Doctor Who. Even though he is at first glance a stock heavy, Challis takes Robert Banks Stewart's words, which already give the character more depth than usual, and adds more to make Scorby a living, breathing and three-dimensional creation, and every scene he appears in is lifted by his presence. That's not to ignore some other great character performances, like repentant sell-out Dunbar (Kenneth Gilbert) or nervy reluctant accomplice turned victim Keeler (Mark Jones). The scene where the partially transformed Keeler starts to rant at Sarah, chanting "You want me to die" over and over is one of the moments in Doctor Who that most scared me - and, as mentioned above, I was in my 20s before I saw it for the first time. Even a minor character like Amelia Ducat (Sylvia Coleridge) shines. It's a nice bit of writing that she looks like a one-scene comic relief character, then unexpectedly returns as a complication factor, threatening Chase's plans. Just when we believe that she's coincidentally blundered in to things, it turns out she's a spy, deliberately investigating. It's no coincidence that when all these characters have exited or been killed off, the story runs out of steam - a giant green monster just isn't as interesting.

Connectivity:

I don't think this has ever happened before, but the titles of this story and the last one on the blog rhyme. The Seeds of Doom follows Boom. Bada-bing, bada-boom! Apart from that, both stories feature soldiers and an explosive device with a countdown. There's a reference in Boom to sentient mud, which is I suppose not that far from sentient plants, though the mud in the Ncuti story turns out not to be sentient in the end.  

Deeper Thoughts:

Milestone Watch Extra. As mentioned a couple of times before in blog posts this year, I have given up social media. As such, I have to get my news, including my Doctor Who news, from other sources. There's a certain obsessive fan flavour of FOMO - what if a box set was announced and I didn't hear about it to pre-order until the next Doctor Who Magazine arrived, and what if that was too late and they'd sold out, arrggh! - that compels me to regularly do an online search on the phrase 'Doctor Who' and check the News tab. There's very rarely any actual news, of course, but there are always hits. Nine out of ten of the hits will be clickbait articles on 'entertainment sites' speculating about something or other, or investigating some continuity error from a decade ago, or extrapolating a major character's return from something an old actor said at a convention. The tenth hit will invariably be an unconnected article with a headline along the lines of "Colorado doctor who slept with dozens of his patients jailed". I'd still rather get my Doctor Who news this way, though. This is because there's one thing I don't ever have to deal with using my approach: seeing Tom Baker trending, and having to investigate to confirm that the worst has not happened. My FFOMO, my fan fear of missing out, does not cross that boundary. The news that one day is sure to come, and may it be a long way off, that Tom has passed on is news that I'm happy to miss out on for as long as possible. I didn't grow up with Tom Baker's Doctor. I first watched Doctor Who when he'd just left the role, and the first story I ever saw of his was his swansong Logopolis when it was repeated in late 1981. Yet, such is the significant impact Baker had on the show in his time in the title role and ever since, that I feel it is required to take stock in the Deeper Thoughts section now I've completed blogging all his stories.

I promise I won't make a habit of this in posts to come (I'm near the end now, so most blog posts from this point on will be finishing some era or other). But, completing Tom Baker's era - seven years, 41 (or 42) stories, 170+ episodes, the exact numbers will depend on whether you count Shada or not - is the biggest mountain in the range I have had to climb, and is worth dwelling upon for a while. As I mentioned above, I only got into Doctor Who after Tom had left the role, so my experience of watching his stories was in a random order, which I then emulated in the way I've watched every Doctor's stories for this blog. After the repeat of Logopolis, the main way for me to watch his stories was when they came out on VHS as part of the official range. That range was slow to get going, but when tapes did start to be released the majority of them were for those stories starring Tom Baker. The first story of his I saw on tape was Revenge of the Cybermen, and the first one I bought was Pyramids of Mars. As noted in the First Time Round section above, there were eventually other ways to see Baker stories for the first time; I did see a few from pirated videos, and watched a few on UK Gold. The one thing I never did after Logopolis was catch a Tom Baker repeat on the BBC. This was mainly because the Beeb kept showing the same story (Genesis of the Daleks) whenever they repeated one of Tom's ones, and I'd already watched it on video. I worked out when I blogged it that the final Tom Baker I watched was The Sun Makers, when that story was released on VHS in 2001, so it took me 20 years to view every part of Tom's Who oeuvre (or Whoeuvre, if you will).

It didn't take 20 years to rewatch all the stories randomly for this blog, but it was getting on for half as long. The first one to come up was The Armageddon Factor - not an auspicious start - which I blogged in July 2015; nine years and four months later, the job was done. Tom stories came up with a reasonable regularity in the years in between. It didn't take too long (up to October 2017) for the blog to land upon Tom's first ever story, as the chronometer flies, Robot - the Deeper Thoughts section of whose post contains my tribute to the man behind the scarf, including mention of the time I met and had a book signed by Tom (a tale I think I may have told elsewhere on the blog too - apologies, I'm an old man who sometimes repeats himself). It took a lot longer before I blogged his last ever story (and the first of his I ever saw) Logopolis. I finally blogged it in December 2021. I had a few surprising reactions to stories over the years; the most disappointing watch was probably Terror of the Zygons. I'd always enjoyed viewing the story, never seeing - until the watch for the blog in September 2021 - that the story falls apart half way through. The same team (writer, director and composer) worked on The Seeds of Doom, and second time round they manage to put off the point where things fall apart until late on in the final episode, so it's overall much better. The Robots of Death maintains its high quality with every watch, including the one in December 2022 for the blog; Horror of Fang Rock gets better every time I see it, and might well turn out to be my favourite Tom in a couple of viewings' time. Underworld is nowhere near as bad as you might think. All in all, this body of work is a decent legacy for the great man. Seeing as they'll seemingly let anyone have a go at being president (twice, even) no matter how manifestly unfit and unqualified they might be, I'd say let Mister Baker do it. Tom for President!  

In Summary:

It's got atmosphere, it's got pace, it's got engaging characters and a lot of incident... it just hasn't got an ending.